February 4, 2007...8:00 pm

Richard Dawkins: The God Delusion

Jump to Comments

I just picked up a copy of Richard Dawkins new book ‘The God Delusion’ after reading Atanu Dey’s suggestion to everyone to get a copy before it is banned since the book criticises the monotheistic religions and could very soon get into the cross hairs of votebank politics.

After going through the preface and the first two chapters by now i think that is not likely to happen. Why? Because the book deals with the subject in a very logical manner without any resort to sensationalism or isolating of any particular faith for “special treatment”. Richard Dawkins takes the following view.

I’am not in favour of offending or hurting anyone just for the sake of it.

and makes his stand clear with the following disclaimer.

It is in the light of the unparalled presumption of respect for religion that I make my own disclaimer for this book.I shall not go out of my way to offend, but nor shall I don kid gloves to handle religion any more gently than I would handle anything else.

The book deals with religion as a whole but concentrates much of its analysis of the phenomenon of God according to the views of the monotheistic or the three Abrahmanic faiths- Judaism, Christianity and Islam.


The book also touches upon the subject of polytheism and nature worship as practised through the ages by the ancient romans, greeks, egyptians, mesopotamians, celts, norsemen, mongols, native americans, Australian aboriginies, pacific islanders, African tribesmen, Japanese, Chinese and ofcourse by the Hindus in the beginning of the chapter on ‘The God hypothesis’. Richard Dawkins makes his stand very clear in this respect too when he declares.

I know you don’t believe in an old bearded man sitting on a cloud, so let’s not waste any more time on that. I’am not attacking any particular version of God or gods. I’am attacking God, all gods, anything and everything supernatural, wherever and whenever they have been or will be invented.

So if you belong to one of the above categories and are thrilled at the way Dawkins is aiming his artillery at the monotheistic/Abrahamanic faiths, The above quote should be more than enough to dampen that enthusiasm.

But paradoxically Richard Dawkins asserts that the polytheism of the Hindu faith is nothing but ‘monotheism in disguise’.

There is only one God – Lord Brahma the creator, Lord Vishnu the preserver, Lord Shiva the destroyer, the godesses Saraswati, laxmi and Parvati(Wives of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva), Lord Ganesh the elephant god, and hundreds of others, all are just different manifestations or incarnations of the one God.

This is somewhat puzzling to me and It is best left to people more knowledgeable on the Hindu scriptures to say whether Dawkins is right or wrong in this matter.

The book overall is a good read and raises some really good questions about the phenomenon of Religious faith- Is it necessary to be religious to be moral?, Is indoctrinating children from a very early age into the religions of their parents and typecasting them as such before they could make up their own minds about it a form of child abuse?, And can the existence or non-existence of God be logically proven or disproven.

And here is a Channel 4 TV documentary by Richard Dawkins on the same subject titled ‘Root of All Evil’.

Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, part 5.

Also Richard Dawkins Interview on BBC and Newsnight

Update: B Shantanu of Hindu dharma has written  a well researched post rebutting Richard Dawkins claims of Hinduism being nothing but monotheism in disguise in his book ‘The God Delusion’.

4 Comments

  • Apollo, Richard Dawkins quote in your post prompted this post and research:

    http://hindudharma.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/hinduism-not-monotheism-in-disguise/

    Thanks.

  • You wrote:
    But paradoxically Richard Dawkins asserts that the polytheism of the Hindu faith is nothing but ‘monotheism in disguise’.

    There is only one God – Lord Brahma the creator, Lord Vishnu the preserver, Lord Shiva the destroyer, the godesses Saraswati, laxmi and Parvati(Wives of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva), Lord Ganesh the elephant god, and hundreds of others, all are just different manifestations or incarnations of the one God.

    This is somewhat puzzling to me and It is best left to people more knowledgeable on the Hindu scriptures to say whether Dawkins is right or wrong in this matter.

    Reply:
    You are correct that YOU are confused about Hinduism. Dawkins has quoted correctly, but a little off the mark.

    Hinduism is not monotheist in the Judaic sense that there is Only One God. It recognises all gods IN ONE Reality.b All others are manifentations of that One.

    Hinduism is MONISTIC.

  • Way to miss the mark there.

    If you were paying attention, you’d know that that quote you pulled out of context there was a narratization of a potential cynical attempt by the Hindu church to get tax exempt status in a country that only bestows such a benefit on monotheistic religions – all while making a funny little point about the Christian trinity (Three, three, three gods in one! Oh, and an entire hierarchy of angels. And saints. All of which represent God. Monotheism? Yeah, why not.)

    Of course, context doesn’t really mean anything if you’re *looking* to get offended, does it?

  • Hindu view of God is succintly mentioned in Ishopanishad as follows: “Ishavasyam idam sarvam yat kinca jagatyam jagat”.

    This means: “Everything in the Universe is a projection of the Supreme Lord”. It means “everything thing is God” or “There is only God”.

    This is a monotheistic view that is subtle but significantly different from others.

    The Upanishad declares – “asatam sat jayeta”, meaning, from the invisible, the visible manifested itself. So this universe is a manifestation of That which is invisible, unthinkable, untouchable and imperceptible.

    In essence, Hindus philosophy is saying that it is impossible for you to be the subject and God the object (as in subject-verb-object) – in other words, you cannot perceive God.

    Thus, Richard Dawkins is not saying anything Hindus have not thought of. Hindus have already said that facts, logic, and deduction are useless in your search for God. Richard Dawkins reached the scientific conclusion which Hindu Philosophy predicted he would.


Leave a Reply